http://www.soabloke.com/2009/10/05/the-science-debate-is-over-now-we-need-an-effective-response/ pushing soa up the slope (with a pointy stick) Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:33:11 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.soabloke.com/2009/10/05/the-science-debate-is-over-now-we-need-an-effective-response/comment-page-1/#comment-623 gerry Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:13:15 +0000 http://www.soabloke.com/?p=151#comment-623 why is it that everytime a politican or scientist for that matter questions the science behind "global warming"/ "climate change" they are attacked on a personal level. I don't know if its man made influence or a natural phenomenen, but we do know the climate is always changing over the millions of years the earth has existed. But solid debate over the science has never taken place and bullying from peolpe like you always prevent this from occuring. I was a believer in the end of the Great Barrier Reef due to the crown of thorns star fish, I thought koalas were going to be extinct from chlamydia and my computer was going to crash at the start of the new millenium, so excuse me if I still want some solid debate over this. For starters why is now called climate change not global warming lets start the debate with that simple question. why is it that everytime a politican or scientist for that matter questions the science behind “global warming”/ “climate change” they are attacked on a personal level. I don’t know if its man made influence or a natural phenomenen, but we do know the climate is always changing over the millions of years the earth has existed. But solid debate over the science has never taken place and bullying from peolpe like you always prevent this from occuring. I was a believer in the end of the Great Barrier Reef due to the crown of thorns star fish, I thought koalas were going to be extinct from chlamydia and my computer was going to crash at the start of the new millenium, so excuse me if I still want some solid debate over this. For starters why is now called climate change not global warming lets start the debate with that simple question.

]]> http://www.soabloke.com/2009/10/05/the-science-debate-is-over-now-we-need-an-effective-response/comment-page-1/#comment-622 john james Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:58:01 +0000 http://www.soabloke.com/?p=151#comment-622 Thankyou Saul! In Canberra just 18 months ago the assembled scientist agreed, not without reluctance,that 2 degrees was inevitable. Now they are leaning towards double that. 4 degrees being inevitable spells food production at half its present level, repeated catastrophic bush fires, minimum 15 meter sea level rise within our life times, a billion refugees and mega wars for food and water that very likely to include atomics. Tony Abbot, take care! John Thankyou Saul!
In Canberra just 18 months ago the assembled scientist agreed, not without reluctance,that 2 degrees was inevitable. Now they are leaning towards double that. 4 degrees being inevitable spells food production at half its present level, repeated catastrophic bush fires, minimum 15 meter sea level rise within our life times, a billion refugees and mega wars for food and water that very likely to include atomics.
Tony Abbot, take care!
John

]]>