<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web-Oriented SOA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.soabloke.com/2008/05/17/web-oriented-soa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.soabloke.com/2008/05/17/web-oriented-soa/</link>
	<description>pushing soa up the slope (with a pointy stick)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:33:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul Caganoff</title>
		<link>http://www.soabloke.com/2008/05/17/web-oriented-soa/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Saul Caganoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 08:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soabloke.com/2008/05/17/web-oriented-soa/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments Ron. Yes, I like RESTful Services and WS-Stack Services.

Saul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Ron. Yes, I like RESTful Services and WS-Stack Services.</p>
<p>Saul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Schmelzer</title>
		<link>http://www.soabloke.com/2008/05/17/web-oriented-soa/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Schmelzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 17:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soabloke.com/2008/05/17/web-oriented-soa/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Great comments! We also struggled with the double use of the word &quot;orientation&quot;.

Here&#039;s some additional possibilities:

In re: WOA
* RESTful SOA
* RESTful Services

In re: Web Services
* SOAP-based SOA
* WS-Stack SOA

But your suggestions above are good as well. I&#039;d shy away from Interface-based Services since that doesn&#039;t specifically indicate Web Services and can include a whole class of interfaces not part of the WS-* family.

Long and short of it, I&#039;m glad we agree!
Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments! We also struggled with the double use of the word &#8220;orientation&#8221;.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some additional possibilities:</p>
<p>In re: WOA<br />
* RESTful SOA<br />
* RESTful Services</p>
<p>In re: Web Services<br />
* SOAP-based SOA<br />
* WS-Stack SOA</p>
<p>But your suggestions above are good as well. I&#8217;d shy away from Interface-based Services since that doesn&#8217;t specifically indicate Web Services and can include a whole class of interfaces not part of the WS-* family.</p>
<p>Long and short of it, I&#8217;m glad we agree!<br />
Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
